Hang it up
February 1st, 2008, 1:37 pm by BrianWe got a phone call this weekend from a candidate seeking our respective votes in the presidential preference primary. Oops, my mistake, we actually got 24 friggin’ calls from several candidates seeking our votes. That’s 24 calls, all perfectly timed around supper, doing the dishes, watching Olivia DeHavilland and Montgomery Clift in The Heiress (our latest NetFlix film), reading the paper, visiting with friends, and just about everything else you’d rather not stop doing in order to hear what were mostly prerecorded messages.
One call was actually a real, live person. I envisioned, based on the enthusiastic tenor of his voice, an avid College Republican in his starched white shirt and red tie, earnestly at his phone, wondering if Senator McClain (or was it Governor Romney? They all blur together.) could count on my vote.
The truth is, I had already voted early, and it wasn’t for either the senator or the governor. (It was for Ron Paul, if you really must know. He was the only candidate that didn’t disturb us in the privacy of our home. And I’ve always been fond of underdogs.)
But since I had a real live person on the phone, and not a prerecorded robocaller, and since I had already dried my hands, having been doing the dishes, I took the opportunity to chat with him. He obviously didn’t like it, because I was supposed to just shut up and listen to his spiel and then promise to vote as he directed. He wasn’t prepared to be engaged in conversation, especially when he started getting a spiel. “Do you really think interrupting people at dinner time will make them more sympathetic to your candidate?” I asked him.
“Well sir,” he explained, “we need the grassroots support of people such as yourself. We don’t have all the Hollywood celebrities and left-wing media support that the Democrats have.”
That was news. The party of Enron, Huliburton, the oil industry and Fox News needed my grassroots support.
I pointed out that our home phone is listed on the National Do Not Call Registry. This, I probably don’t need to point out to you, matters not a whit to politicos. When they passed the law, they made sure they, their minions (such as the earnest young man who was allowing my dishwater to get cool) and their pollsters were exempted from the very relief from intrusive phone calls that taxpayers demanded.
The College Republican apologized, sounding almost sincere, and offered to take us off the Republican Party’s calling list. I thanked him and resumed doing the dishes.
The big issue here is politician’s complete and shameless ignorance of our clearly stated preference to be left alone. Even if they did exempt themselves from obeying the Do Not Call Registry–which was such a blatant, shameful and insultingly contemptible thing to have done–you’d think they’d respect why we, and millions of our similarly assaulted phone service users, signed up for it.
Did we put ourselves on the registry because we like having our homes invaded by unwanted pitches, either sales or political? Are politicians so dimwitted that they actually believe, as was explained to me by Kristi Campbell, Mitt Romney’s Florida communications wonk, that we desire “information” that can only be delivered by a recorded message delivered in the middle of dinner? Do they think we don’t read newspapers, visit Web sites, gather campaign literature and otherwise educate ourselves as responsible voters should?
No, we put ourselves on the registry because we don’t want politicians intruding into our lives when we’re in the comfort and security of our homes, any more than we wanted the sales pitches for the shady vacation “deals” to the Bahamas we used to get before public outcry resulted in the registry’s creation in 2003.
Even though politicians exempted themselves from the National Do Not Call Registry itself (forever earning the contempt of the citizens who demanded the relief it has partially provided), they will never be morally exempt from the spirit of the registry. If they really wanted to earn the respect of voters, candidates should proudly declare they acknowledge and respect the reasons we put ourselves on the registry, and pledge to use it to scrub their phone lists of those citizens who have clearly said they don’t want to be disturbed.
A slightly smaller, but no less important, issue is the matter of respect. If a politician respects your Do Not Call preference as little as his campaigners respect laws against posting his yard signs all over public right-of-ways, why should you trust him to represent you on bigger issues once he’s in Washington (or Tallahassee), or, for that matter, why should you trust him to obey major laws if local sign pollution ordinances mean so little?
Incidentally, since Kristi Campbell sees no problem with using your phone to give you “information” about her boss’s campaign, maybe you’d like to share some information of your own about the practice with her. Her cell number is (850) 491.4295. I’m sure she wouldn’t mind hearing from you as she’s obviously a very big proponent of using the telephone to share “information.”
By the way, we also kept track of our “real” phone usage over the weekend. We received five calls from family and friends between Friday and Tuesday nights. We placed four of our own. Hence, we used our phone nine times for legitimate calls. Politicos, who made 24 calls to us, usurped our phone for almost 73 percent of its usage last weekend. Our phone bill, excluding internet service, is about $45 a month. I figure we’re well within our rights to bill the Republic Party for that 73 percent of our phone usage that they hijacked. That’s about $32.73.
I wonder if they’ll pony up their share of our bill? Oh, silly me. I forgot. They don’t have the support of rich Hollywood celebrities. They probably don’t have the cash.






